2017-06-10

society needs to change their opinion on judgment

judge for good.
judge for bad.
the former is allowed,
the latter is not.
why both be not allowed?
-_-

2017-03-17

yet another thing society needs to change

There's something we teach kids from an early age on and it is to learn with each other, the problem is the rewarding system for such behavior cannot be verbatim from child to child. The result might be a child who piggybacks on others expecting to do more help but really causing more harm.

Statements, expressions, anything for that matter are like windows of energy. Society has fallen/been broken to the point where people deny these "energies" and thus they could possibly prematurely cut these windows.

Sometimes (and actually this should be more often if we expect mankind to evolve) to properly express an idea we need to explain both the negative and the positive. The issue that sometimes arises is the cutoff time. Because it is important to end on a good note, to effectively counter a negative note, a larger frame recognition of the negative note is needed, say like explaining "the bad news," and "not holding back." The problem, which is now in the past because you are reading this, was not having enough patience to hear the full beat of the negativity before it is countered with the even-better beat of positivity.

From here on out, hope, which is a positivity-direction inducing generator, is necessary to prevent continual negative beats.

Like, once you learn, why would you go back to the less-evolved ways? Notice how hope is a optimistic designator.







Evil is part of greed. Greed is a chaotic selfish energy which slaves intelligence. Love can never arise out of greed because the logical function of greed will be to consume itself. This is why evil uses greed. In fact both evil and greed are synonymous with each other.

Love is compassion, growth and evolution. It has respect to its past and future; its where it builds and grows but doesn't consume towards death.


So to recap back to the main point.

There are good people who have had their patience cut, who are very near a powerful band of energy manipulators who actually create great downfalls of energy rather that positivity because of said diminished patience.

If you put love, compassion, care as a primary endeavor, then whatever impatience that might befold upon you will be saved/overlooked because of this, in fact it might have been destined to be this way.



If we are to obtain world peace we must identify two variables: extreme and selfishness.
Selfishness isn't bad at a low amount, for it is quite harmless at personal levels; like taking a breath.
Extreme isn't a bad at when appropriately directed, It what makes glohal changes possible.
The issue is when these two variables find a host to grow in, thus resulting in the manifestation of greed.

We're literally destroying the world because of extreme selfishness.
Don't heavily blame the gasoline drivers, steak eaters, etc. blame those who lead the industries.

quite often you find that they are greedy,
hoarding a lot of money and luxuries.
aka the 10s

others you'll find take advantage of the throwmedowns from the greedy and are willing to put their physical life on the line. These are those who carry a weapon and uphold the laws or participate in war.
aka the 9s

Ladies and Gentlemen,
beware of the 10s and 9s

2016-12-01

What society needs to change

lets say you and me are asking and answering questions back and forth.
lets say you ask me what I like
and I answer and then say "you?"
that means the same question applies to you
I discovered that the more succinct the question, the more genuine the answer-er needs to interpret the question. Here is where the element of their values become obvious.
If the individual has poor empathy, the opposite becomes rich: narcissism.
The more empathetic the answer-er, the more mirrored the question is answered in relation to your answer. Otherwise the difference is a narcissistic interpretation of the question.
If the answer-er gives you a question instead of an answer, how and what causes insecurity is also revealed.

2016-11-12

2 more discrepencies society must fix

The first is when nonparty delegates rules to those in a party.

For example a nonchristian telling a christian "that's not christian."

For a group to label itself (which is acceptable if its for a good cause), it must meet certain requirements. If someone or somegroup who is not labeled as such, attempts to use those external requirements (external to those who aren't in the group) as a means to argue their point, its usually for their gain.

The kicker is, how is that person or group ever eligible for getting what he/she/they wants if that person is literally out of the requirements for that group?

This is a situation of trickery. This process ISN'T one for one. In a way its almost considered "stealing." Because you "steal" their pride. Don't do this sort of behavior in society, unless its for a good cause. i.g. christian wants to become more christian and is looking for nonchristian opinion.. in this example it would actual serve as "advantageous" to the christian.


reward for simple memory retrieval.

lets say person A has a birthday and person B finds out about this birthday through talking to person A. to then wish happy birthday isn't actually garnered in effort, for it was a simple knee-jerk reaction. Yet people tend to show over-gratitude for this. If someone actually remembers your birthday and wishes you a happy birthday, there is undoubtedly more effort which has gone into the process as opposed to telling them and receiving it on the spot.

A simple memory retrieval is fundamentally important to begin the roots of memorization, however the intent is to start developing longer and longer term memory. If you're reading this right now you should already be past this.


cheers

2016-08-03

Everyday I'm trying to come up with something new

to fix up the world. Because that should be the goal, yet everybody seems to have this selfish alternative?

We're literally killing the planet, yet science wants to come up with this selfish answer that the planet can't kill itself and will save itself.

What?

Such stupid ideas thoughts, whatever you want to call it, implanted into the minds of children..

Speaking of which, here's another one, That the heart cannot have a voice of its own, only the brain.

Now we're past playing with fire, we've begun to kill ourselves.

Take the very fact of the heart having a beat and velocity. The word "velocity" to a non-DAW (Digital Audio Workstation) user would mean speed, but to a DAW-user it actually means strength of the note. In fact, when producing songs on the computer, the electronic piano keyboard sends its notes' pitch and velocity in order to show how hard the note was hit.

So, our hearts have a beat and velocity.

But not just a constant beat. A dynamic beat. It's not hard-coded to be just one rythmn. It needs to adjust to needs and.. get this.. endeavors.

Because if you say your heart beats faster when you run, how bout you start beating your heart faster right before you run.

Why be behind your heart, when your heart can live more in the present.

love always

2016-07-30

Two things we should fix for the future: flipping the 9s and proofing the double negatives.

I'll start with the--Flipping the 9s

Throughout history our biggest threat has been those who hoard wealth. They create an unnatural atmosphere to the general population. In essence, living peacefully isn't possible because there is a vacuum effect of greed which causes disruption towards the rest of the chain.
The kicker about these hoarding ones is they always get help. I call them the 9s.
I call them the 9s because 8 is as far as one needs to go, its representative of infinity. Someone comes by and doesn't just want one digit. They want two. thus they label themselves as the 10.
the 9 and the 10 always own the majority of the wealth. The 9 places itself strategically between the master hoarder and the rest of the infinite souls and community. The 9 is that bridge in which the 10 gets its excess. The 9 is always talking with the 8s and below, finding new ways to motivate them in exchange for an unfair piece. It's always been the 9s who upheld the laws which were never in the majority's favor. People who were brainwashed to believing the 10s are their saviors. Willing to martyr for those who constantly take an unfair piece of the pie.

I don't care what you say, or what you think otherwise: If a man has 30 cars whilst one struggles to keep just one, the owner of the 30 is wrong.

Or perhaps, as an asshole would say, the owner of the 30 cars just has a lesser bubble of responsibility care.
Well who is telling that guy to increase the bubble? The 9.
The 9 is going to get the 10 another car. And yet still lowly-paid mechanics designing said car are actually driving cheaper competitor cars. I wonder why..??

An excess of wealth is bad.

This is what I mean about flipping the 9s. There are people out there who ride the curtails of the mega-rich and are looking for an opportunity to be a humanitarian*/philanthropist to all those under them... Pretty much theres a 9 who wants to be an 8. Wants to be part of the majority collective. To participate with the children of the universe rather than stand on a mountain with the devil.

*I feel like if I used the word "human" instead, the meaning wouldn't get across as smoothly. Don't think so? Please comment..

Proofing the Double Negatives

I've started to notice that there are moments where we let the logic of math become irrelevant to discussion.
One of them are double negatives.
People get a kick if a person talks with multiple negatives compounding yet intelligently manifested to make an advance thought sense.
But what about using it to capture evil?
Let's say a situation where negativity is compounded, or not negativity as in SAD or BAD but more like negativity in terms of the OPPOSITE.
What is the opposite isn't necessarily bad.. right?
This is a complex idea that needs to be defined because if it isn't, evil uses it for its solo performance and advantage.

Take the word" advantage" just above.
It would only be "an advantage" for evil, but a disadvantage for those good.
So what I do is I change an "evil idea" into a "a good idea" by hijacking their "excuse" and turning it into a MY better version. So I would say "This is a complex idea that needs to be defined because if it isn't, evil uses it for its solo performance and disadvantage."

By infiltrating the "excuse" statement with a wrongly angled word (such as an opposite, or a negative version, or the version that you perceive from your side--hopefully better--), evil turns good from the inside out.

Pretty much it's like making a black hole make its own oppositely induced blackhole with itself in an effort to cancel out the entire problem to begin with.

"Proofing the double negatives" doesn't actually apply to this method specifically though.
It applies to how a double negative needs to be properly identified. Every. Time.

Because if we support some as correct (even thought they shouldn't be) for example: "I didn't steal nothing." is possibly regarded as a poorly-educated-minded answer.

But if you think about it, that statement can also be.. That they could've still stolen something.

There's something I've been trying to confiscate from the devil and its where it no longer has a free-standing polarity-inducing node.

If you can flip the polarity of something without consequences..
it better be for good..

If the soul is infinite, there cannot be evil in there.

In other words, Shake the devil off.

Use double negatives intelligently, because then one can stretch an idea further and even use that method against evil to fix an incorrect mentality. So by being able to "proof" your double (or even triple or quad--i think you get the idea) negatives you develop a strong psyche to fix the broken mentalities of the super greedy and gluttonous. Kinda like the super-persuasion of a jedi knight towards some weaker-minds storm troopers.

love always.

2016-07-21

why evil happens

first of all you can't say "these guys will pay for their evils."
because the american court system doesn't acknowledge the very word but the evidence acting towards the word.
therefore they say "these guys will pay for their crimes" instead.



so you can't say it?
and then what happens?
no wonder evils keep happening.
because we're forbidden to step over a current standard towards a better standard which is:

assuming that statements have a deeper intelligence and meaning to it so that everything doesn't have to be barney-styled explained.

To literally raise the american people's intelligence.

by not saying they're not intelligent.

or how about supporting their education?


just because you make something illegal doesn't make it bad.

but we're under hypnosis to think that it does.

I'm fixing my hypnosis, I'm getting out of it.

The only problem is a lot of people are stuck in it and its easy to get back in it because I care about these people and I want to connect with them.

I just don't like a situation where people think they own me, or they think they're better than me.

the way they get more than the average person.. why? who said so?

anyone who puts themselves above the other doesn't understand the importance of being part of a group.

They're the ones who will point their guns (police) at you.

its not about starting a riot.

its about eliminating the proding.

the reason for war is elitism.

the very scheme in which a higher "power" asserts their conclusions in order to continue the gap between the people, so that others will have less than needed, resulting in a pressure equalization of war.

so if people just collaborated more, and operated fairly with eachother, why and how would there be war?

you can't peace if you let the guy who screwed you, screw your friend too. Hesh is your friend. you both got screwed.


now there exists neither a word in the english language for both he and she, because the word "it" certainly doesn't apply.

because if you wish to speak of a human of either gender, you have to put a foreward slash or nominate the male version.

thats stupid.

no wonder there has been such animosity between genders.

our language separates and priorities the way we talk about eachother.

so I've come up with a couple replacement words..

Heshe, shee, shehe, shhee, hesh, or sheh
instead of he/she

himer, erhim, or herim
instead of him/her

and hiser,  or heris
instead of his/her


I'm hoping that male and female genders can literally vote for these choices, to add these three new dictionary words to neither indicate gender but simply human in proper English context which "demands" it.

I can picture women and men nationwide hand in hand voting on a word which neither separates them nor divides them.

what about the word mankind?

but then I hear a voice saying "its stupid," and now i know with all my heart that there is an evil which speaks decisions of pessimism, free reign to rule over the people, coupled by the fact of the wealth accumlated by unfairly superstancing themselves over "the lesser."

its not communism. its fairness.
lets start a movement of "fair" and assume that people are intelligent to undesrstand it.

i love you